May 18, 2013

Which Fed Members Want To End Bernanke’s Low Rate Party

May 18, 2013

Which Fed Members Want To End Bernanke’s Low Rate Party

Last week, Bespoke Investment Group said this about the impact of quantitative easing (aka Fed bond buying to keep rates low) on stocks, mortgage bonds (MBS), and the broader economy:

With the Fed continuing to pump $85 billion in liquidity into the markets on a monthly basis, one would expect the party in equities and most areas of fixed income to keep going. The big question is what happens when the music stops. The chart below is one we have shown several times over the last few years and basically compares the Fed’s balance sheet to the S&P 500. As the size of the Fed’s balance sheet increases, the S&P 500 has risen, and each time the Fed paused, equities declined. Based solely on the last four years, investors have every right to be looking over their shoulders to make sure the Fed is still there.


While the outlook for the Financial markets once the Fed starts to try and exit is uncertain, we think the time for them to exit will come later rather than sooner. Going back to 1930, the average annual growth rate of the US economy has been 3.3%, but the last time the economy even grew by 3% in a given year was in 2005, which was the year Bernanke became Fed Chairman. At seven years and counting, Bernanke has presided over the longest stretch of sub 3% growth ever. With a record like that, we wouldn’t expect him to pull the plug until he is extremely confident that the US economy will see 3% growth.

Lower GDP in the Bernanke era is certainly a good rationale for why the Fed might hold steady on QE. But Bernanke is known for his consensus management style, and there’s growing dissent in the Fed ranks on when to wind down QE—or at least signal a wind down. Rates rose last week as bond markets were rattled by such signals.

Tuesday, I noted 3 QE wind down signals that were driving bonds lower and rates higher, then Thursday Bloomberg reported that 3 Fed officials want less MBS buying:

…Dallas Federal Reserve Bank President Richard Fisher said today buying mortgage bonds risks disrupting the market, while Philadelphia Fed President Charles Plosser said, “it’s not good for the bank to be holding lots of mortgage paper.” Jeffrey Lacker of Richmond said to reporters yesterday the Fed should “get out of the credit allocation business.”

… “When refinancing activity eventually shifts down, the Fed could soon be buying up to 100 percent of MBS issuance if the current purchase program continues,” Fisher said today in a speech in Houston. “Buying such a high share of gross issuance in any security is not only excessive, but also potentially disruptive to the proper functioning of the MBS market.”

… Lacker said yesterday the central bank should reinvest the principal from its mortgage bond holdings into Treasuries. “That would be a really reasonable step to contemplate at this point given the strength in the housing market right now,” he said to reporters in Baltimore.

… Plosser said today in a Bloomberg Television interview he “would like to see us get out of mortgage-backed securities.”

… Fisher said in response to audience questions he wants to see the central bank’s balance sheet eventually returned to an all-Treasuries portfolio. While Fisher has been one of the most outspoken opponents to bond buying among Fed officials, he said in February he didn’t want to stop purchases “cold turkey,” which could destabilize the market.

…“The housing market is on a self-sustaining path and does not need the same impetus we have been giving it,” Fisher said today to the National Association for Business Economics in Houston. With the success of continued buying “questionable,” he said, “I think we can rightly declare victory on the housing front and reel in — or dial back — our purchases, with the aim of eliminating them entirely as the year wears on.”

All relevant arguments for less QE (especially with respect to MBS, which directly impact mortgage rates) so it’s easy to think this counters Bespoke’s theory that QE will come “later rather than sooner.” But it actually supports it because these three Fed officials don’t get policy votes on the FOMC this year—voting FOMC members rotate (schedule) so Plosser and Fisher are alternates this year and will rotate back into voting roles next year, and Lacker won’t rotate in until 2015.

So it might take until next year for Fed Exit chatter to become policy.

Meanwhile, the 2013 votes indicate full tilt QE. On the surface anyway. At the May 1 FOMC meeting, 11 members voted in favor of current agressive QE policy and 1 voted against. We’ll get more details of what those voting members really think this coming Wednesday, May 22 when the minutes from that meeting are released. Market participants parse those minutes for the slightest hints of doubt coming from FOMC members who keep voting for more QE.

Until then, we could see more defensiveness in MBS, which means elevated rate levels.